Monday, June 26, 2006

Design ≠ Craft

Some interesting points from Robert Aish:
“We can characterize design as being different to craft (because the designer does not directly act on the material, but has an indirect, and arguably more powerful, way of controlling materialization). Similarly, we might characterize computational design as being different to conventional design (because the designer is not directly drawing the geometry, but has an indirect, and arguably more powerful, way of controlling that geometry using computational design tools).

In this way we should view computational design as part of a normal progression in which the designer and the artifact are separated by an increasing number of levels of indirection, that in turn introduce higher levels of expression and control. Opponents of this may question whether introducing these levels of indirection is in fact progress, arguing that intuition and spontaneity will be inhibited with the increased remoteness between the designer and artifact, Happily these layers of indirection are not arranged linearly, but can be configured to form a closed loop. The advent of digitally controlled fabrication means that the ‘geometrically aware’ and ‘computationally enabled’ designer is as close to the materialization as in the original craft process, but with precision and control and the ability to explore variation which was previously unimaginable.

The question now is: what are the characteristics of computational design tools that facilitate this approach to design and what are the corresponding abstractions which need to be internalized and operationalised by designers?”

AISH, R., 2006. Exploring the analogy that parametric design is a game in OOSTERHUIS, K., and FEIREISS, L., (eds.) The architecture co-laboratory: game set and match II. On computer games, advanced geometries and digital technologies. Rotterdam: Episode Publishers. pp 203.

2 comments:

carlos said...

your explanation suffers from cartesian anxiety. i don't agree.

Cartesian anxiety refers to the notion that, ever since René Descartes promulgated his highly influential form of body-mind dualism, Western civilization has suffered from a longing for ontological certainty, or feeling that scientific methods, and especially the study of the world as a thing separate from ourselves, should be able to lead us to a firm and unchanging knowledge of ourselves and the world around us. The term is named after Descartes because of his well-known emphasis on "mind" as different from "body", "self" as different from "other".

Qing Cai said...

prada outlet
tiffany outlet, http://www.tiffany-outlet.us.com/
polo lacoste pas cher
hollister shirts
michael kors canada, http://www.michaelkorsoutletcanada.in.net
real madrid jersey
celine outlet
lacoste polo shirts
juicy couture outlet
michael kors outlet online, http://www.michaelkors-outlets.us.com
swarovski jewelry
prada handbags
ray ban sunglasses
nike roshe
calvin klein underwear
gucci handbags
ghd hair straighteners, http://www.ghdhairstraightenerssale.co.uk/
louis vuitton outlet store, http://www.louisvuittonoutletstore.name/
hermes birkin
timberland shoes
ray ban, http://www.occhiali-rayban.it/
san antonio spurs jerseys
tory burch outlet
five fingers shoes
new england patriots jerseys
longchamp handbags
louis vuitton handbags
oakley sunglasses
green bay packers jerseys
babyliss
cai2015909

Blog Archive

My Portfolio

John Marshall Portfolio

My Linkedin Profile

View John Marshall's profile on LinkedIn

rootoftwo's shared items

About

I am exploring a hybrid form of art and design practice through the use of computer-based design and fabrication tools. I am interested in experimental objects and spaces that are dynamic and responsive and seek to challenge perceptions, expectations and established behavior.

Creative Commons

My del.icio.us

Site Meter