Thursday, May 25, 2006

Haque + Bleecker


The Poker Club at the Beehive Inn in Edinburgh featured Usman Haque (artist/architect) and Julian Bleecker (technologist/artist/think tank leader) to discuss the "internet of things" and "open source architecture". Hosted by New Media Scotland.

Both presenters took us through a short run down of their work and then there was a lively exchange between everyone present. Hopefully there will be a podcast from New Media Scotland in the near future.

Haque's presentation was broken into three categories: Invisible Stuff, Collaborative Stuff (produced by non experts - or vernacular creativity) and Social Space. He talked about Architecture as an operating system for the collaborative production of space. He stressed the importance of the necessity of the system (whether an augmented object or space) to have the capacity to build 'its' own perceptual categories. Several examples of previous and current work were shown.

Bleecker started with the question 'Is life hackable?' He characterised the upsurge of activity as a renewed or second order humanism. The term 'change agents' was used and it was pointed out that these are no longer well positioned parties such as New York Times reporters. Several projects were shown which showed how digital networks can shape physical activities in a sort of network practice - social practice continuum. It was stressed that we're not just talking about data transactions.

Some interesting points that came up in the discussion:
  • We are surrounded by invisible information, how do we make this visible or legible?
  • Technology extends the zone of our perception/agency.
  • Is the web of objects the end of subjectivity or a new beginning for subjectivity?
  • The role of human beings as filters.

The issues emerging for me are what do we mean by 'understanding' in relation to all the information we have access to and how do we have agency within it? One thing that came up over and over was the spatial or prepositional nature of our relationship to the digital networked public. As Bleeker points out in Why Things Matter are we 'on' or 'in' the network?

1 comment:

lin liyi said...

But hey, there are going to be a lot more replica watches Daytonas around for me when people drop them for the new one so I not complaining. I know many that can buy these watches like rolex replica sale but you talking about the folks that are perhaps watches store generation elites that spend money like that, or perhaps the one hit start up wonders that make it rich. Either way you not completely wrong but even the uber rich are spend like that, it probably the reason they are wealthy in the first place. If the replica watches sale is a fraud and rolex should be taken down with extreme prejudice. That is like one of those shocking days in the world when every few years when they have a significant anniversay and they do all the interviews. The rado replica gets high marks from me for having a well proportioned case. Thin and wearable uncommon for a modern mechanical chronograph. Let them run a site see how difficult fake rolex sale can be to keep the content flowing, how much of your own time is spent on keeping the site up and running and keep everyone happy.

Blog Archive

My Portfolio

John Marshall Portfolio

My Linkedin Profile

View John Marshall's profile on LinkedIn

rootoftwo's shared items

About

I am exploring a hybrid form of art and design practice through the use of computer-based design and fabrication tools. I am interested in experimental objects and spaces that are dynamic and responsive and seek to challenge perceptions, expectations and established behavior.

Creative Commons

My del.icio.us

Site Meter